<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SAP: Functional Areas in Distributions &amp; Assessments</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.whypad.com/posts/sap-functional-areas-allocations/609/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.whypad.com/posts/sap-functional-areas-allocations/609/</link>
	<description>Tools and Tricks for Life and Tech</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 14:27:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Byron Bennett</title>
		<link>http://www.whypad.com/posts/sap-functional-areas-allocations/609/comment-page-1/#comment-4104</link>
		<dc:creator>Byron Bennett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 18:47:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whypad.com/?p=609#comment-4104</guid>
		<description>Hi Tim,

Yes, you&#039;re right, I meant that it was posting the default Functional Area, and not using the FA of the Senders.

Part 2 yes, that last part is be the posting.  The profit centers on the Debit of the posting are coming from the top section, which represents the Tracing values, the FA there is due to having the FA populated in the FA field on the Senders/Receivers tab of the assessment setup, and the sender only had an FA of 1050, which gets posted.

I should go back and draw some arrows on the image now that I have Snag-it ;-)  But I&#039;ll hold off until somebody actually needs this info.

Thanks for the comments.  I&#039;ll update the post with the info you passed along!

Cheers,
Byron</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Tim,</p>
<p>Yes, you&#8217;re right, I meant that it was posting the default Functional Area, and not using the FA of the Senders.</p>
<p>Part 2 yes, that last part is be the posting.  The profit centers on the Debit of the posting are coming from the top section, which represents the Tracing values, the FA there is due to having the FA populated in the FA field on the Senders/Receivers tab of the assessment setup, and the sender only had an FA of 1050, which gets posted.</p>
<p>I should go back and draw some arrows on the image now that I have Snag-it <img src='http://www.whypad.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' />   But I&#8217;ll hold off until somebody actually needs this info.</p>
<p>Thanks for the comments.  I&#8217;ll update the post with the info you passed along!</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
Byron</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.whypad.com/posts/sap-functional-areas-allocations/609/comment-page-1/#comment-4103</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 18:32:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whypad.com/?p=609#comment-4103</guid>
		<description>ok..sounds like most of your analysis is correct, however, i observed a few things...

&quot;The problem was that the distribution did not carry the Functional Area of the original postings.  In fact, it wasn’t carrying a Functional Area at all and was getting the default functional area for revenue accounts&quot;

In the above statement your saying it wasnt carrying the functional area at all, i think what you mean to say here is that &quot;the original functional area is not carried over to the receiver distributed amount, however, instead the default functional area is added&quot;...So in fact the functional area is not blank...

Also, i cant see where your getting the receiver profit center functional area values...that is unclear also in your example...are you saying as a result of a &quot;test run&quot; on the distribution without having checked the &quot;functional area all&quot;, that the amounts posted into the receivers look like that?

Thanks,

Tim</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ok..sounds like most of your analysis is correct, however, i observed a few things&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8220;The problem was that the distribution did not carry the Functional Area of the original postings.  In fact, it wasn’t carrying a Functional Area at all and was getting the default functional area for revenue accounts&#8221;</p>
<p>In the above statement your saying it wasnt carrying the functional area at all, i think what you mean to say here is that &#8220;the original functional area is not carried over to the receiver distributed amount, however, instead the default functional area is added&#8221;&#8230;So in fact the functional area is not blank&#8230;</p>
<p>Also, i cant see where your getting the receiver profit center functional area values&#8230;that is unclear also in your example&#8230;are you saying as a result of a &#8220;test run&#8221; on the distribution without having checked the &#8220;functional area all&#8221;, that the amounts posted into the receivers look like that?</p>
<p>Thanks,</p>
<p>Tim</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

