<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for WhyPad</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.whypad.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.whypad.com</link>
	<description>Tips, tricks, and hacks for life and tech...</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 03:20:16 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on SAP: Deciding about SAP-BPC (nee Outlooksoft) by Charles L.</title>
		<link>http://www.whypad.com/posts/sap-deciding-on-bpc/145/comment-page-1/#comment-961</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles L.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 12:04:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whypad.com/posts/sap-deciding-on-bpc/145/#comment-961</guid>
		<description>Hi Byron,
The complexity and cost of integrating Khalix into our landscape outweighs its benefit.  We have been runing Khalix since 1999 and it has simply become another one of those underutilized poorly understood applications.  It is a legacy application in every sense of the term.
Good to hear about BI-IP support until 2016!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Byron,<br />
The complexity and cost of integrating Khalix into our landscape outweighs its benefit.  We have been runing Khalix since 1999 and it has simply become another one of those underutilized poorly understood applications.  It is a legacy application in every sense of the term.<br />
Good to hear about BI-IP support until 2016!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Contender - A Free WordPress Theme Released by Byron Bennett</title>
		<link>http://www.whypad.com/posts/con-wordpress-theme-released/283/comment-page-2/#comment-957</link>
		<dc:creator>Byron Bennett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 02:46:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whypad.com/?p=283#comment-957</guid>
		<description>Brian,
Thanks for giving it a shot.  Hope it works for you.

Cheers!
Byron</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brian,<br />
Thanks for giving it a shot.  Hope it works for you.</p>
<p>Cheers!<br />
Byron</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Contender - A Free WordPress Theme Released by Bryan White</title>
		<link>http://www.whypad.com/posts/con-wordpress-theme-released/283/comment-page-2/#comment-956</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryan White</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 00:26:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whypad.com/?p=283#comment-956</guid>
		<description>I have also started using Contender on my frugal living blog. I haven't customized it much, partly because I wouldn't know how, but also because I think it looks pretty good the way it is. I like it because it is clean, uncluttered and easy on the eye.

Thanks for making it available.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have also started using Contender on my frugal living blog. I haven&#8217;t customized it much, partly because I wouldn&#8217;t know how, but also because I think it looks pretty good the way it is. I like it because it is clean, uncluttered and easy on the eye.</p>
<p>Thanks for making it available.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on SAP: Deciding about SAP-BPC (nee Outlooksoft) by Byron Bennett</title>
		<link>http://www.whypad.com/posts/sap-deciding-on-bpc/145/comment-page-1/#comment-955</link>
		<dc:creator>Byron Bennett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 21:00:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whypad.com/posts/sap-deciding-on-bpc/145/#comment-955</guid>
		<description>Hi Charles,

BI-IP could certainly be the right choice in the right circumstances.  Last I heard, BI-IP will have extended maintenance available through 2016.  That gives companies quite a while to get to a good stable platform before going unsupported.  A lot of things can change in 7 years!

I I've heard a few times now that BPC doesn't deal with complexity as well as some other solutions out there.  I think, as you allude, that Kris also mentioned that above.  On the other hand, I have heard that Khalix is pretty good with complex models and dealing with large amounts of data.  Has that been your experience with Khalix?  And if you don't mind sharing, why are you looking to replace Khalix?

Hope your search goes well.

Happy new year!  Here's to a healthy and prosperous 2009!
Byron</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Charles,</p>
<p>BI-IP could certainly be the right choice in the right circumstances.  Last I heard, BI-IP will have extended maintenance available through 2016.  That gives companies quite a while to get to a good stable platform before going unsupported.  A lot of things can change in 7 years!</p>
<p>I I&#8217;ve heard a few times now that BPC doesn&#8217;t deal with complexity as well as some other solutions out there.  I think, as you allude, that Kris also mentioned that above.  On the other hand, I have heard that Khalix is pretty good with complex models and dealing with large amounts of data.  Has that been your experience with Khalix?  And if you don&#8217;t mind sharing, why are you looking to replace Khalix?</p>
<p>Hope your search goes well.</p>
<p>Happy new year!  Here&#8217;s to a healthy and prosperous 2009!<br />
Byron</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on SAP: Deciding about SAP-BPC (nee Outlooksoft) by Charles L.</title>
		<link>http://www.whypad.com/posts/sap-deciding-on-bpc/145/comment-page-1/#comment-954</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles L.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 16:33:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whypad.com/posts/sap-deciding-on-bpc/145/#comment-954</guid>
		<description>Really enjoying the discussion on this topic.  Particularly like Kris' perspective.
We are conducting research on a new planning tool (to replace Khalix).
We are a VERY large SAP installation running BI 7.0.  
BI-IP makes sense over BPC for so many reasons:
- users and IT are already familiar/experts with BI functionality
- our BI landscape/master data is well established - seems logical to simply build planning into this as another dimension.
- no additional licensing costs.  This is a big consideration for us. 
- Better standardization and centralized control (and reconciliation)
- proven track record
- better integration with other SAP systems
- we don't need any consolidation functionality
If you're running BI 7.0, I can't see any reason to pay additional licensing and get your users/IT people trained up on a tool that SAP bought last minute to compete with the big boys like Hyperion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really enjoying the discussion on this topic.  Particularly like Kris&#8217; perspective.<br />
We are conducting research on a new planning tool (to replace Khalix).<br />
We are a VERY large SAP installation running BI 7.0.<br />
BI-IP makes sense over BPC for so many reasons:<br />
- users and IT are already familiar/experts with BI functionality<br />
- our BI landscape/master data is well established - seems logical to simply build planning into this as another dimension.<br />
- no additional licensing costs.  This is a big consideration for us.<br />
- Better standardization and centralized control (and reconciliation)<br />
- proven track record<br />
- better integration with other SAP systems<br />
- we don&#8217;t need any consolidation functionality<br />
If you&#8217;re running BI 7.0, I can&#8217;t see any reason to pay additional licensing and get your users/IT people trained up on a tool that SAP bought last minute to compete with the big boys like Hyperion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on SAP: Adding Past Validity Dates to Existing Cost Centers by Linda Lappine</title>
		<link>http://www.whypad.com/posts/sap-adding-past-validity-dates-to-cost-centers/198/comment-page-1/#comment-950</link>
		<dc:creator>Linda Lappine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 20:17:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whypad.com/?p=198#comment-950</guid>
		<description>Hey Bryon:

Well, I've done everything I could think of.  I have searched OSS and the web and have found very little.  In the IMG under cost center accounting and cost center master data you can delete inactive master data and inactive cost centers.  I hesitate to use any delete function as I'm not sure what would be deleted.  The information I've obtained does not clearly detail the process.  Currently I have an active version of cost center S0820 in an analysis time frame of 01/01/1994 to 12/31/2008.  When I use the icon "display mode active/inactive" I get an inactive: change status with the time frame of 12/28/1998 to 12/31/2009.  I have to activate this cost center for 2009.  The heirarchy falls as follows in TC OKEON (again, I've always used KS01 to create the cost center with reference so that I can extend a new validity period, but the company I work for now has been using the hierarchy method.  I've never come up against this issue in the past 14 years.  The heirarchy starts with "LMW Standard Hierarchy", then it is broken down into different nodes.  This one falls under S0800 "Finance &#38; Admin" with lower four lower nodes, S0820, S0830, S0838 and S0840.  The only one that was not activated for 2009 is S0820.  The others are active for 2009.  

I've used KS01 to try to create with reference and I receive the same error message "Inactive master data exists; Active maintenance is not possible" and I can't go any further.  Same error message when you attempt KS02.

My only option may be to delete the inactive master data.  I'll try to recreate the problem in our test environment to try it out before I attempt it.

Thanks for your input....much appreciated.

HAPPY NEW YEAR

Linda</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Bryon:</p>
<p>Well, I&#8217;ve done everything I could think of.  I have searched OSS and the web and have found very little.  In the IMG under cost center accounting and cost center master data you can delete inactive master data and inactive cost centers.  I hesitate to use any delete function as I&#8217;m not sure what would be deleted.  The information I&#8217;ve obtained does not clearly detail the process.  Currently I have an active version of cost center S0820 in an analysis time frame of 01/01/1994 to 12/31/2008.  When I use the icon &#8220;display mode active/inactive&#8221; I get an inactive: change status with the time frame of 12/28/1998 to 12/31/2009.  I have to activate this cost center for 2009.  The heirarchy falls as follows in TC OKEON (again, I&#8217;ve always used KS01 to create the cost center with reference so that I can extend a new validity period, but the company I work for now has been using the hierarchy method.  I&#8217;ve never come up against this issue in the past 14 years.  The heirarchy starts with &#8220;LMW Standard Hierarchy&#8221;, then it is broken down into different nodes.  This one falls under S0800 &#8220;Finance &amp; Admin&#8221; with lower four lower nodes, S0820, S0830, S0838 and S0840.  The only one that was not activated for 2009 is S0820.  The others are active for 2009.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve used KS01 to try to create with reference and I receive the same error message &#8220;Inactive master data exists; Active maintenance is not possible&#8221; and I can&#8217;t go any further.  Same error message when you attempt KS02.</p>
<p>My only option may be to delete the inactive master data.  I&#8217;ll try to recreate the problem in our test environment to try it out before I attempt it.</p>
<p>Thanks for your input&#8230;.much appreciated.</p>
<p>HAPPY NEW YEAR</p>
<p>Linda</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on SAP: Adding Past Validity Dates to Existing Cost Centers by Byron Bennett</title>
		<link>http://www.whypad.com/posts/sap-adding-past-validity-dates-to-cost-centers/198/comment-page-1/#comment-949</link>
		<dc:creator>Byron Bennett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 03:40:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whypad.com/?p=198#comment-949</guid>
		<description>Hi Linda,

Getting that cost center active is going to be the key, I think.  I wouldn't think that you have to be within the activity dates for it to be active....I don't have an idea right yet.  I'll keep thinking...If you could give a few more details on what's happening, that may help.

For one thing, we don't really use Cost Center hierarchies a lot (mostly profit center hierarchies).  So, when you're saying that cost centers are extended under a specific hierarchy, I'm not sure what that indicates.  I wouldn't think that the hierarchy has any impact on the cost center validity dates.  So you may try using KS01 or KS02 instead of OKEON to go about that....just a thought.

Byron</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Linda,</p>
<p>Getting that cost center active is going to be the key, I think.  I wouldn&#8217;t think that you have to be within the activity dates for it to be active&#8230;.I don&#8217;t have an idea right yet.  I&#8217;ll keep thinking&#8230;If you could give a few more details on what&#8217;s happening, that may help.</p>
<p>For one thing, we don&#8217;t really use Cost Center hierarchies a lot (mostly profit center hierarchies).  So, when you&#8217;re saying that cost centers are extended under a specific hierarchy, I&#8217;m not sure what that indicates.  I wouldn&#8217;t think that the hierarchy has any impact on the cost center validity dates.  So you may try using KS01 or KS02 instead of OKEON to go about that&#8230;.just a thought.</p>
<p>Byron</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on SAP: Adding Past Validity Dates to Existing Cost Centers by Linda Lappine</title>
		<link>http://www.whypad.com/posts/sap-adding-past-validity-dates-to-cost-centers/198/comment-page-1/#comment-947</link>
		<dc:creator>Linda Lappine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 15:43:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whypad.com/?p=198#comment-947</guid>
		<description>Hi Byron:

Since you're in the "cost center" world of SAP I have an issue in which you may be able to provide some guidance.  Normally we do exactly what you are suggesting above when extending the validity dates of our cost centers, however, our FI person used the change hierarchy function (TC OKEON).  She successfully extended the dates for all cost centers under a specific hierarchy except one.  She changed to valid to date to 12/31/2009.  It is now inactive.  The active version is 12/28/1998 to 12/31/2008.  We cannot activate the new version.  We cannot change the dates at all.  When I do a check on the cost center we get a message that deletion is not possbible  (dependent record exists in table).  

Any assistance would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks,
Linda</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Byron:</p>
<p>Since you&#8217;re in the &#8220;cost center&#8221; world of SAP I have an issue in which you may be able to provide some guidance.  Normally we do exactly what you are suggesting above when extending the validity dates of our cost centers, however, our FI person used the change hierarchy function (TC OKEON).  She successfully extended the dates for all cost centers under a specific hierarchy except one.  She changed to valid to date to 12/31/2009.  It is now inactive.  The active version is 12/28/1998 to 12/31/2008.  We cannot activate the new version.  We cannot change the dates at all.  When I do a check on the cost center we get a message that deletion is not possbible  (dependent record exists in table).  </p>
<p>Any assistance would be greatly appreciated.</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
Linda</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on SAP-FICO: Overview of EC-CS Consolidations by Byron Bennett</title>
		<link>http://www.whypad.com/posts/sap-fico-overview-of-ec-cs-consolidations/90/comment-page-1/#comment-946</link>
		<dc:creator>Byron Bennett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 05:03:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whypad.com/posts/sap-fico-overview-of-ec-cs-consolidations/90/#comment-946</guid>
		<description>Peter,
Excellent!  Glad I was able to help.

Byron</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peter,<br />
Excellent!  Glad I was able to help.</p>
<p>Byron</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Join AAC/MP3 Files and Create Audiobooks for iPod Use by Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.whypad.com/posts/join-aacmp3-files-and-create-audiobooks-for-ipod-use/321/comment-page-1/#comment-945</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 01:33:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whypad.com/?p=321#comment-945</guid>
		<description>Simon,  I tried that and while I can see the files saved under the audiobooks tab in itunes, when I sync with my ipod they still show up under the "Music" section and not audiobooks.  I have a fourth generation ipod.  Any idea why I'm having a problem?

Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Simon,  I tried that and while I can see the files saved under the audiobooks tab in itunes, when I sync with my ipod they still show up under the &#8220;Music&#8221; section and not audiobooks.  I have a fourth generation ipod.  Any idea why I&#8217;m having a problem?</p>
<p>Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
